Adaptive reuse is a creative mode of conservation that gives heritage structures new and alternative functions other than the original ones that may no longer be required. Most often than not, built heritage resources are found on premium real estate property so developers are in a hurry to demolish rather than restore and recycle. Today, there is a growing awareness that adaptive reuse can enhance property value.
A stylized DNA double helix is the focus of the glass-covered central courtyard, the symbolic center of the new Museum of Natural History (Photo from National Museum) |
Nielson Tower was the former Manila International Air Terminal. The first flight of Philippine Airlines took off from here (Photo from Wikipedia uploaded by user Christopher Rath) |
Juan Luna E-Service Building (Photo from Augusto Villalon) |
A close-up of the additional floor of the Juan Luna E-Service Building (Photo from Augusto Villalon) |
In many countries, like Australia, demolition of heritage structures is considered wasteful. The Department of the Environment and Heritage of Australia says, “Sustainable development has become a goal for all Australian governments seeking to balance the health of the environment with the health of the economy. The predominant vision of a sustainable built future is of state of the art buildings utilising energy efficient design and materials. In reality, this vision should consider the 200 years of European built heritage that stands in tandem with the green structures we rightly seek to create.
“The built environment provides a footnote to our histories, helping to identify our places as Australian, rather than generically ‘modern’ or ‘contemporary’. Historic buildings give us a glimpse of our past and lend character to our communities as well as serving practical purposes now.
“In the pursuit of sustainable development, communities have much to gain from adaptively reusing historic buildings.
“Bypassing the wasteful process of demolition and reconstruction alone sells the environmental benefits of adaptive reuse. Environmental benefits, combined with energy savings and the social advantage of recycling a valued heritage place make adaptive reuse of historic buildings an essential component of sustainable development.”
Download a copy of the publication Adaptive Reuse: Preserving our past, building our future for more information and inspiration.
Another Australian publication featuring adaptive reuse comes from the State Heritage Office of the Government of Western Australia. You can download a copy of Heritage in Action: Adaptive Reuse for even more intelligent examples.
Pratt Street Power Planet (Photo from Wikipedia uploaded by user Andrew Horne) |
Western Metal Supply Company (Photo from Wikipedia uploaded by user UCinternational) |
Young Street Lane Offices by Malcolm Fraser Architects is located in a mews street in Edinburgh’s original New Town (Photo by David Cemry) |
Fort Point Loft Condominiums in Boston, Massachusetts which was among the winners of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) 2009 Housing Awards. The three floors that were added was set back so you don't see them at street level. Plus the new building they constructed followed the scale and proportions of the two older buildings. Another AIA honoree is the Ford Assembly Plant which was among the recipients of the 2011 Institute Honor Awards.
McDonald's New Hyde Park (Photo from ScoutingNY.com) |
In Ontario, Canada, Does Adaptive Reuse Pay? A Study of the Business of Building Renovation in Ontario, Canada was written by Robert Shipley, Steve Utz and Michael Parsons. They note, “Older buildings are important aesthetic, cultural and economic resources but in many jurisdictions hundreds of historic buildings have been demolished because developers and bankers argued that the cost of adapting them for new uses is too high. Still, a growing number of reputable developers are completing exciting projects featuring innovative building renovation.” The writers add, “In Ontario, Canada, there exists a group of dynamic and creative investors with a passion for older buildings. Some reuse projects are more costly than new building but not all and the return on investment for heritage development is almost always higher. This has important implications in Ontario where recent legislative changes have finally given local councils the authority to prevent the demolition of listed buildings, but the lessons for other jurisdictions are also important.”
Tutuban Centermall (Photo from Wikipedia uploaded by user Spatrol) |
RCBC Silay City |
Museo Ilocos Norte |
Heritage Conservation Summit 2013: Heritage and Real Estate Development
Heritage advocates, property owners, real estate and mall developers, cultural workers and government agencies will gather on November 9, 2013 for the Heritage Conservation Summit 2013. This year's theme is Heritage and Real Estate Development where discussions will revolve on how built heritage can enhance real estate and mall developments. Mark your calendars! Venue to be announced next month.
wow... hope we can do the same :)
ReplyDeleteHi Ivan, if possible, please message me on my email address pjlalas@phinma.com.ph regarding the November 9, 2013 Heritage Conservation Summit 2013. I'll invite my design and construction colleagues to attend. Thank you!
ReplyDeletePaolo Lalas
Would love to see Escolta revived; its neoclassical buildings are so beautiful! However, gentrification is a possible consequence of adaptive reuse. On one hand, it can displace the current demographic; on the other hand, perhaps we'll see a cleaner Pasig River.
ReplyDeleteLike the article. It shows the side which preserves older buildings. Adaptive reuse makes the building look classy.
ReplyDeleteI don't know if some guys planning to keep their old buildings will like this though. I'm hearing claims from some owners and developers that restoration of some old buildings will be more expensive than building new ones.
They might refute the claim of "the return on investment for heritage development is almost always higher."
My concern is that they might say this:
Visitors and inhabitants will find the building too outdated. They prefer modern malls over historical buildings.
Historical buildings are visited only during nationalistic holidays.
Adaptively reused historical buildings don't appeal to our market, for it makes the building look both expensive and old-fashioned, and still better reserved for nationalistic holidays. This can evoke resentment from the populous masses.
In both ways, it will leave the claim of "return on investment for heritage development is almost always higher" standing on questionable ground.
How can that be refuted?
I like this idea :) I think it's aesthetically pleasing and educational for the future generation.
ReplyDeleteadaptive reuse has been used since the classical period.. it doesn't mean that the building is going for an a different use than the original means we're destroying it's history, we've to be open for integration. Philippines is home to a lot of heritage buildings, unfortunately, we lack funding for its conservation, that is where adaptive reuse enters, we let others lease the space for the building to attain proper maintenance. Like in the case of Manila Central Post Office, though it's not yet official, I think it'll be better to have it leased as a hotel and be restored as a landmark building. So I'm babbling too much now, anyways, thank you for posting this.
ReplyDelete